Yet to come:

Judge: “Mr. Libby- you are hereby sentenced to 20 years in federal pound-you-in-the-ass prison.”

Libby: “Pardon me?”

I learned in third grade that there were three equal branches of our government. Turns out, this fucking retard hasn’t gotten the memo.

On second thought, this isn’t ignorance, it’s treason.

This is actually really touching- at a ceremony honoring a fallen hero in Iraq, President Bush shed a tear.

White House sources indicate that after the ceremony Mr. Bush returned to the White House residence and washed his vagina.

Q Is it possible that the President does not want to announce the deployment of thousands of more U.S. troops to Iraq before the holidays?

MR. SNOW: No, it has nothing to do with that. Cynical, but false.

Let’s see how that squares with Bush’s actions next month when he declares “Time to surge!” and witness all the death, destruction and continued failure that follows.

Hey, at least he’s not wrecking Jebus’s birthday for our troops… that’s mighty Christian of him.

‘Course the source is WorldNetDaily- they shovel even more horseshit than FOX…

Guess they’re saving him for the presidency… they’re gonna need him.  Again.

I suppose this is another of those grand Republican experiments they were all excited about when invading yet another country… perhaps an effort to tell those evil activist judges enforcing our constitution that they are expendable?

Wow. What a despicable moron.

He attacks a guy like Fox, but leaves a real crazy faker like Stephen Hawking alone… (c’mon Stephen, admit it, it’s just an act- we accept your wacky theories, no need for all the horse-shit theatrics.)

Seriously- this shit is indefensible.  He’s over now.

And, Green Day’s “American Idiot” was a stunt? Maybe. But it’s a helluva lot less of a stunt than playing the patriotism card by calling out a vastly more successful band. Who am to judge? It got ‘em on Drudge.

Now, what can we do to get McLusky to work on some of the videos he used to post here? I know, I know … You Tube changed everything. But isn’t there something worth spending an anxiety-ridden computer-fighting 15 hours putting together?

So, while Democrats look poised to take back at least one house of Congress, we all know that this is in spite of the fact that they’re relying on opposition to President Bush rather than on putting forward a positive program of their own, right?

Please.

Seldom has Washington conventional wisdom been a more obedient handmaiden to historical illiteracy.

Let’s say this once and for all, after a deep breath and for the record: In US politics, in off-year elections with unpopular incumbents it is always that way. Always. Hear it again, always that way.

Consider a few examples: the 1946 (Truman), 1974 (Nixon) and 1994 (Clinton) mid-terms. There are a few others that come close. But these are the three big wave elections of the New Deal and post-New Deal eras. In each case, the winning party ran overwhelmingly and almost exclusively on opposition to the sitting president of the opposite party and — in two of the three cases — the congressional leadership.

Link