Thursday, March 18, 2004
Stern Fined By The FCC
Scalia: "I Ain't Steppin' Aside, You Hosers"
Another money quote: "If it is reasonable to think that a Supreme Court justice can be bought so cheap, the nation is in deeper trouble than I had imagined."
All I can say in response to that is, "Bush v. Gore." You're the ones who made it reasonable to think the Supreme Court of the United States had been corrupted by politics. Shame on you, Mr. Scalia. Taking hunting trips with your co-conspirator is just rubbing the American People's noses in it.
NewsMax Calls Howard Stern "Liberal"
Is "shock jock" Howard Stern's voice powerful enough to affect the upcoming presidential election to the extent of sending President Bush packing?
That's what the Boston Globe wants to know, explaining that the liberal talk show host the newspaper describes as a "stripper aficionado, champion of misfits everywhere, all-purpose radio provocateur," has turned his raunchy show into a Bush-bashing marathon.
Calling Stern a liberal is just factually incorrect and shows how poorly researched this article is. Reading through it you get the sense that there's no actual original reporting, just quotes from other articles and recontextualized to slant to the right. Did I just make up a new word? In any case, the vast majority of the candidates Stern has supported have been from the Republic party. (They call Democratic Party the "Democrat Party"- Two can play at that game...)
Because of that glaring mistatement of fact it's very hard to take anything in the article seriously, but then again, since the article appears on NewsMax it's very hard to take any article seriously.
We've Got Someone Surrounded
My guess?
Ralph Malph from Happy Days.

Here's hoping finally focusing on the real enemy is finally paying off. We should have been so focused a year ago, but we had that diversion to take care of...
Update
Okay, it's looking less and less like it's not Ralph Malph but instead Ayman al-Zawahiri. Again, NOT Ralph Malph- Ayman al-Zawahiri.
Tuesday, March 16, 2004
Gone, But Not Forgotten...
"Let me tell you the quality difference between the nominee John Kerry in 2004 and the nominee George Bush in 2000. In 2004, you incorrectly asked John Kerry to name the foreign leaders that would support him because he never said that in the beginning. In 2000, we couldn't get George Bush to name a foreign leader. He couldn't remember their names, period."
Waxman Lays It All Out For Us
Somebody finally got their shit together. Woo.
Hans Blix- Vindicated
President Bush and Prime Minister Tony Blair have lost credibility, the world is not safer now that Saddam Hussein is out of power and it was clear 10 months ago that there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
And that's just the first sentence...
Link
Monday, March 15, 2004
Huge Congressional Power Grab
The beauty of this bill is that when the Supreme Court rules that this law is unconstitutional the congress can reverse it. No more checks and balances.
"How Could Kerry Get The Backing Of Several World Leaders? He Hasn't Met With Any Of Them!"
UPDATE
It's called being misquoted, you fucking retards. The pool reporter who transcribed the conversation messed up- he wrote 'foreign leaders" instead of "more leaders" by mistake.
Link
Ha ha.
Anybody remember when Colin Powell was the non-evil one in the administration? You remember, before he lied to the UN... wigged out on a congressman... and threw a hissy fit at that congressional staffer?
Department Of Propaganda Strikes Again
U.S. Videos, for TV News, Come Under Scrutiny
By ROBERT PEAR
Published: March 15, 2004
WASHINGTON, March 14 — Federal investigators are scrutinizing television segments in which the Bush administration paid people to pose as journalists praising the benefits of the new Medicare law, which would be offered to help elderly Americans with the costs of their prescription medicines.
The videos are intended for use in local television news programs. Several include pictures of President Bush receiving a standing ovation from a crowd cheering as he signed the Medicare law on Dec. 8.
The materials were produced by the Department of Health and Human Services, which called them video news releases, but the source is not identified. Two videos end with the voice of a woman who says, "In Washington, I'm Karen Ryan reporting."
But the production company, Home Front Communications, said it had hired her to read a script prepared by the government.
Another video, intended for Hispanic audiences, shows a Bush administration official being interviewed in Spanish by a man who identifies himself as a reporter named Alberto Garcia.
Another segment shows a pharmacist talking to an elderly customer. The pharmacist says the new law "helps you better afford your medications," and the customer says, "It sounds like a good idea." Indeed, the pharmacist says, "A very good idea."
The government also prepared scripts that can be used by news anchors introducing what the administration describes as a made-for-television "story package."
In one script, the administration suggests that anchors use this language: "In December, President Bush signed into law the first-ever prescription drug benefit for people with Medicare. Since then, there have been a lot of questions about how the law will help older Americans and people with disabilities. Reporter Karen Ryan helps sort through the details."
The "reporter" then explains the benefits of the new law.
Lawyers from the General Accounting Office, an investigative arm of Congress, discovered the materials last month when they were looking into the use of federal money to pay for certain fliers and advertisements that publicize the Medicare law.
In a report to Congress last week, the lawyers said those fliers and advertisements were legal, despite "notable omissions and other weaknesses." Administration officials said the television news segments were also a legal, effective way to educate beneficiaries.
Gary L. Kepplinger, deputy general counsel of the accounting office, said, "We are actively considering some follow-up work related to the materials we received from the Department of Health and Human Services."
One question is whether the government might mislead viewers by concealing the source of the Medicare videos, which have been broadcast by stations in Oklahoma, Louisiana and other states.
Federal law prohibits the use of federal money for "publicity or propaganda purposes" not authorized by Congress. In the past, the General Accounting Office has found that federal agencies violated this restriction when they disseminated editorials and newspaper articles written by the government or its contractors without identifying the source.
More
Sharpton's Out
Sykes
The kicker to the whole discussion is people openly wondering how the U.S. would respond to a terrorist attack right before the election. Lots of people are saying they would lineup behind el presidente -- there's a scary thought with Bush trailing in the polls.


